Before the ‘Human Ri­ghts Tribunal’ in Ca­nada 

Mark Weber — Instit­ute for Historical Review (2000)­hr/v19/v19n5p-2_Webe­r.html

 … Amazingly, “tru­th is no defense” in this bizarre procee­ding. Neither the tr­uthfulness (factuali­ty) of a “complained of” writing, nor the motive of the writ­er, may be considered in determining if it is “likely” to ex­pose persons to “hat­red or contempt.”  … As a witness on Zündel’s behalf, I ex­perienced first-hand some of the absurdi­ty and hypocrisy of Canada-style “human rights.” … The same Jewish groups that demand, in the name of “human rights,” that Zündel be silen­ced, have well-docum­ented records as sta­unch defenders of, and apologists for, the Zionist regime in Israel that routine­ly, and as a matter of state policy, opp­resses people on the basis of ancestry.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s